ad: Annual 2024 Now Open For Entries!
*

*&%££!! On copywriting, artichokes and swearing.

Published by

I think I've only ever met two people who never swore. One for moral and religious reasons, the other had taught herself not to, because she thought she was doing it too much. I admired them both for their self-control and adhering to something they believed to be right.

Nevertheless, for right or wrong, I do swear. A fair amount I suppose, but not particularly excessively - although certainly a great deal more when speaking than when writing. As a blogger and copywriter, it is obviously wise to temper the use of sailor-speak when typing. A blog littered with profanity is going to upset someone very quickly, and that may well be the person paying me, so I like to avoid that hazard. And very few clients brief a copywriter to create an ad, app or website littered with rude words. Indeed, that has never once happened.

But it's interesting the way in which certain words have so much power that their use is restricted in these areas. If I was to write an ad or a column that included the word 'artichoke', I could do so without fear of negative consequences (provided, I suppose, it was relevant). However, if I undertook the same task and wished to deploy the word 'f*ck' - all sorts of potential troubles would rear their heads. Which is obvious from the fact I've had to use an asterisk instead of the vowel, in the previous sentence. Only, they're both just written characters. The second word cannot directly cause physical harm or peril, because it's just a word. Or is it?

"We're repelled, excited or provoked by the images these words conjure."

Swear words are usually (although not always) associated with sexual or bodily functions, and they have appeared because we have an instinctive reaction to those aspects of human behaviour. We're repelled, excited or provoked by the images these words conjure - so the words themselves now have the ability to inspire the same reaction, by proxy. 'Artichoke' produces a neutral mental image of an edible thistle, whereas 'f*ck' ignites any number of highly charged associations. There is clearly a hierarchy of strength in our vocabularies. All words are not the same, and if we image language to be a box of fireworks, we can see that some are sparklers (he, she, they, the, it, and), some are roman candles (fear, joy, wonder, grief, love, thrill) and others are big, dangerous rockets (you can add your own swear words here).

Although I was sure it would come, I always imagined I wouldn't live to see a mainstream advertisement containing swearing. I was wrong. A couple of years ago, the Australian Tourist Board ran a campaign on British TV. The pay off featured a pretty woman asking "Where the bloody hell are ya?". It was a great piece of work, enhanced by the taboo-busting script; funny, unexpected and loaded with Aussie personality. Okay, 'bloody' isn't the strongest obscenity in the box, but it used to be much more of contender. As a schoolboy, had I used the word in earshot of a teacher, I would have been heartily punished. In thirty years, 'bloody' has moved from shocking to completely acceptable. I heard a caller use it on the radio only this morning, and the presenter didn't turn a hair.

So, does this mean we will eventually hear the dreaded 'c' word in daytime broadcasts and advertising campaigns?  Frankly, yes. There is no reason why one swear word would evolve to become tame and tolerable and not another. It won't happen next week, or anytime soon, but it will happen. Late night TV is now an open field for any 'bad' language in the book. The 'c' word is never heard on adult panel games (although 'f*cking is), but it is used in dramas. That would have been unthinkable just twenty years ago.

True, I get a bit fed-up when I hear somebody use 'f*ck' as mere punctuation. Largely because it takes away much of its venomous sting - but I won't stop swearing. I quite enjoy it - and it's particularly handy when I'm frustrated, alarmed or irate. I try not to do it in front of children or elderly relatives, but other than that, my industrial potty mouth does more or less what it likes.

Swear words are a wonderful part of our verbal heritage. We should be revering, celebrating and relishing those funny, abrasive, angry and forceful syllables, rather than letting them upset or offend us. Who the f*ck's with me?

Magnus Shaw is a f*cking copywriter, blogger and consultant

Website
On Creativepool

Comments

More Leaders

*

Leaders

Regenerating London’s Commercial Quarter #BehindTheBrand

This week, we spoke to longtime Creativepool friend and SomeOne Founder Simon Manchipp, to discuss his agency’s visual identity for a bold new regenerative programme in London. What was the brief? Create a new comprehensive visual and verbal...

Posted by: Creativepool Editorial
*

Leaders

Should Creative Directors be on the Board?

Creativity is typically viewed as a softer skill. Consequently, it’s rarely valued in business as much as it ought to be. When budgets are planned and operations strategised, finance and technology are favoured, with creative roles habitually...

Posted by: Dawn Creative
*

Leaders

Inspiring Female Leaders: An Interview with RAPP CEO Gabrielle Ludzker

Gabrielle Ludzker is not just any CEO. The current head honcho at customer experience agency RAPP has spent her career breaking away from the traditional corporate CEO stereotype. and leads to inspire rule breakers. Gabby is an inspirational rule...

Posted by: Benjamin Hiorns
ad: Annual 2024 Now Open For Entries!